Wednesday, December 14, 2011

1-4-6

Analysis of Reality Television
            Reality TV has been around for a long time and doesn’t appear to be going away. According to Reality TV magazine (2011), there are over 200 reality shows on the air and more are up and coming all the time. What makes these shows so popular? I believe The American Myth of Success plays a big role in the success of reality TV.
            Reality TV stars are average Joes with no special or unique talents and no acting experience. The general audience is able to relate to these types of programs because they could possibly see themselves being on one of the shows. With no experience necessary, anyone who is willing to live their life on the TV screens can be on a reality show. The fact that some of these reality stars do profit monetarily and gain added fame after the airing of the show leaves the viewers thinking they can be a person of interest on one of these programs.
            Some of the most interesting things I found were the formulas used in the reality shows. They all seem to follow the same setup with the same ingredients. Although reality TV is entertaining as is, I would like to see some of these reality shows change up the theme. Some of the shows are so repetitive that they become predictable and not as enjoyable to watch. Other things I learned was how popular reality TV is. Reality TV is being aired all over the world and most programs are stemmed from shows produced and aired in Britain. It was interesting to see the trends of pop culture spreading around the world.
            I don’t really think I will view reality TV any different than I did in the past. I like watching real-life situations unfold on TV and the suspense of it all from one week to another. One disappointment I did find was that some of the shows are somewhat scripted and there is a lot of editing done before they go on air. All in all, I will continue to be a fan and tune in every week to my favorite programs.  

Friday, December 9, 2011

1-4-5 Formula

Analysis of Reality Television:
Formulas
            Reality TV is becoming more popular, with shows like, American Idol and Joe Millionaire out-rating popular TV series. Reality shows ranked 4 out of the top 5 shows most viewed on Nielson Company’s list (Monaco, 2011). With increasing popularity, there has to be a formula to these shows that keeps viewers wanting more. In order to recognize the patterns, you must depict the differences and similarities of the shows.
            The competition shows all have real people performing activities related to the theme of the show and foregoing weekly elimination until a winner is crowned. The “finding love” shows have real people vying for the attention of the bachelor or bachelorette. Once again, a weekly elimination is performed leaving two “contestants” for the picking. The makeover and improvement shows share the theme of a person, car or home is stripped away of all things bad and made over to a glamorous look, ride or curb side appeal.
            After viewing the different types of reality shows the only difference one can see is the themes of the shows. They all seem to follow the same formula. There is a beginning, middle and an end. The format of the shows is the same. Bad Girls Club and Jersey Shore film real people living in a house together doing what they do and towards the end they go on a mini-vacation together. All of the reality shows have “confessionals” where the cast can vent or speak freely with the privacy sought after. These shows also have a reunion after the airing for the viewers to hear and see the reactions of the cast after the show airs.
            Some other obvious formulas can be displayed with runoff shows. Project Accessory is a runoff program of Project Runway, with the competitors designing accessories for outfits. Personally, I have only seen the show once but it followed the exact same format as Project Runway.


http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:RPeIpxrmsUsJ:www.news.ku.edu/2011/october/28/realitytv.shtml+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
           


Monday, December 5, 2011

Asst 1-3-2 Journal Article Analysis

Journal Article Analysis:
Movies, Model Ts, and Morality: The Impact
of Technology on Standards of Behavior in the Early
Twentieth Century
            Melissa E. Weinbrenner, the author of this article, provided detailed information on the behavioral changes as technology advanced. This article was directed towards a general audience and would be considered educational and informative. This analysis will provide a summary of the article, the main ideas presented, the style of the writing and the key idea that I took from this article.
Subject-Specific Theories and Concepts
            The overall essence of the article was providing concepts and theories about how technology is thought to have influenced society’s behavior and thought process changes. Some examples of these theories include the evolution of the automobile and how it closed the gap between middle and high class society. Another theory was that machine users had changed their thought behaviors because of the repetition of handling the machine did not challenge a person’s intelligence. Movie theatres becoming popular influenced society’s view of reality. Movies were not filtered and immoral acts were allowed to be viewed.
Article Summary
            This article gave insight to how technological advancements may have influenced the changes in people’s behavior, thought process and morals. The author explained how automobiles were made affordable to the middle class which not only closed the gap between the classes but the closed vehicles providing privacy for people to do as they wish without being seen or judged. Immoral acts and crimes were concealed behind the doors and windows of the vehicles which, according to the author, were bittersweet to the elite. On one hand, the higher class folk could no longer point the finger at a lower class for immoral or criminal acts, but on the other hand the elite, themselves, could perform the same acts without affecting their own. Another way that vehicles affected the morality of the people was the attendance in church declined. It was suggested that people were driving for pleasure instead of going to church.
            Another reason for the decline in church was the increase in the number of people going to watch movies. Since censorship was void, moviegoers were freely inducing the attitude of divorce and extramarital affairs as acceptable. What was once considered a personal, behind-closed-doors affair; sexual acts were applauded on the big screen. This also led to people accepting open discussions of sexual content being socially accepted.
            The article also described how the use of machinery inhibited people’s thinking. Basically, if a machine user repeatedly assembled one piece of a product, then they would eventually stop “wondering” how the rest of the product was put together. The youth of this era was also subject to the evolving technology. The youth was learning the new advancements and so they “old” ways of doing things were becoming null and void. Younger people’s views of society were being molded to fit the ever-changing world and the ways of their elders were becoming less important and less acceptable.
Style
            I felt the article was logically organized, to a point. It seemed that the opening paragraph summarized the latter part of the article. The author went into the second paragraph talking about studies that had been done and went through the findings for the first half of the article. The main ideas were clearly presented even though the flow of the article seemed, to me, to be obscure. The text and article, overall, was very easy to read and rather interesting.
Main Points
            I found this article rather enjoyable to read. I never realized how the simplest advancements would influence behavior and how people mentally and socially engage. After reading this article I would have to say that I agree with the author’s main points. Without the in-depth information, I probably would not have originally agreed. However, after reading the supporting material I can see a correlation between the behavior patterns and the changing technology.
            I think this article is important because it provides information that would be essential in predicting social attitudes towards future technology. Analyzing behavior and reactions to new products is key to inventor’s success.
Key Idea
            The key idea that I took from this article is that technology influences the attitudes of society in a way that what was once considered immoral or impractical is acceptable and almost expected. Technology strives to make life easier. Unfortunately, it is sometimes at the sacrifice of our conscious.






References
Weinbrenner, M. E. (June 2011). Movies, model ts, and morality: The impact of technology on standards of behavior in the early twentieth century. The Journal of Popular Culture, 44(3), 647-659.



           
           

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Analysis 1-4-4 Heroes

Analysis of Reality Television:
The Hero
            We all watch movies or read books where you can clearly define the hero of the story. He or she is usually the main character of the story and goes above and beyond to show selfless and usually dangerous acts to protect the people. There may also be conflicting ideas of who the hero is. For example, would you consider Superman or Clark Kent to be the hero? At times, it is not so obvious who the hero is. This is the case when referring to reality programs.
            Initially, you would not think that there would be a hero on a reality program. However, if you consider the characteristics of a hero, then you will find that there almost always is a hero of the sorts. For instance, America’s Next Top Model is a reality modeling competition. This season has former “competitors” who were given a second chance. These models were selected by votes that were cast by the viewers. One of the models, Allison, does display hero characteristics. You will not tune in to see her leap tall buildings to save Tyra Banks; however, you will see her genuinely caring for the other models on the show. Whenever someone is upset, she is there to listen, encourage and support them.
            Other reality programs such as Survivor, usually emits someone who leads their team to victory. In this case, the leader would be considered a hero. Some non-competition shows can have several heroes that correspond to different situations.
            I think no matter what form of entertainment we are engaged in, we always look for the hero. In reality programming, there is always one personality that tends to rub us the wrong way. In this case, we anticipate that someone will step up and be the hero and dismiss the enemy. We applaud antics, whether good or bad, that rids us of having to suffer through the irritations of that personality we don’t particularly like. In the end, we all expect a hero in any scenario.

https://www.google.com/search?q=antm+allison+harvard&hl=en&prmd=imvnso&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=1YrWTpavLqKQsAKMvLWgDw&sqi=2&ved=0CCgQsAQ&biw=1440&bih=672

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Analysis 1-4-3 Rituals and Stereotypes of Reality TV

              In this analysis, we will look at the rituals and stereotypes of reality TV. You might think that since reality TV is not supposed to be scripted, how can there be rituals? We will discuss some of the rituals that are performed among all reality shows and a few examples that you may or may not have thought of. We will also discuss stereotypes that have been correlated to reality shows.
            Merriam-Webster defines a ritual as an act that is done in a particular situation in the same way each time (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/ritual%5b2]). As we have learned, rituals can be performed by one person or a group of people and can be done on a daily, weekly, monthly or yearly basis. How does this definition apply to reality shows? Jersey Shore cast members began a Sunday dinner ritual on the very first aired show and continues to current viewings. Another example of a ritual performed on the show is also performed by one person. It is no secret that the cast frequents nightclubs a few times a week. At a certain time on those nights, Pauly D yells out, “It’s T-shirt time!” and then when the cabs arrive, he yells out again, “Cabs here!” Although these may not seem like obvious rituals, they clearly make up the definition of the word.
            Stereotyping has also become an outside factor for the show. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding the actions and impressions that the cast envelope. The biggest controversial stereotype is the cast and MTV using the words, “guido and guidette”. Several organizations have filed complaints against MTV for using these slang words stating that they are offensive. According to Wikipedia, Senator Joseph F. Vitale has stated that the show is in violation of the hate crimes in New Jersey and interferes with the pursuit of freedom and opportunity (http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:GB4hqDwmZTEJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_of_Jersey_Shore+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us). While I can understand the feelings of some on this particular reality show, on the same hand, I would like to hear their opinions on popular movies, such as The Godfather or the HBO series, The Sopranos. What is your opinion?


Sunday, November 20, 2011

Analyis 1

Analysis of Reality Television
            Currently there are over 500 reality television shows that have aired over the last 10 years. Reality TV began trending shortly after the movie, The Truman Show, was shown on the big screen. According to Steven Reiss and James Wiltz, the reason people watch reality television shows is because the people on the shows are their peers and it is easy for the audience to relate to and also gives them a feeling that can be on a reality show. This analysis will entail theories of popular culture that apply to reality TV.
            Reality TV seems to host the American Myth of Success. As noted above, people relate to reality shows because they can see themselves being part of them. Most of the people casted on reality shows have no acting experience and some profit from various ventures after the shows air. A lot of the “big personality” reality stars create a rather large group of followers. For example, Snooki, a New Jersey Shore reality star has wrote a book, appears on many talk shows and is being tweeted about constantly. It seems that everywhere I went this year, I overheard women who wanted to dress as Snooki for Halloween.
            Some reality shows like American Idol and America’s Next Top Model, offer the winners of the show a career in singing and modeling. Some do not offer cash prizes or careers but there are perks to being casted on the show. For example, Bad Girls Club and Jersey Shore do not offer prizes but do provide a nice place for the cast to stay, trips to different vacation spots and set up places for the cast to work.           
            There are many different points of view concerning reality TV. Some people view it as nonsense while others prefer to watch reality. Reality TV can be quite entertaining as it is real-life. For the most part, the shows are not scripted and the events that take place are not rehearsed. I, myself, enjoy watching reality shows of all kinds because they grasp your attention and are relatable. Many of the events are things that have either happened to me or I have witnessed happening.

           
           

Friday, November 18, 2011

Contemporary Icons of Pop Culture

I chose Hello Kitty, Cabbage Patch Kids and Legos to represent the three contemporary icons of pop culture. These icons represent different eras and continue to play a  major role in pop culture.  I chose these icons because out of all my toys, Hello Kitty and Cabbage Patch are the two I distinctly remember being fascinated by. I chose Legos because my 9 year old son has a mad Lego collection and we are constantly searching for the older ones from back in the day.

Hello Kitty, whose real name is Kitty White, was born in Japan in 1974. Two years later she was introduced to the United States where she was greeted with open arms. Hello Kitty has made her mark globally and has been widely accepted even today. Kitty's face has been attached to everything from coin purses to cars. Although her target audience was to young girls, Kitty has been embraced by women of all ages. In addition to movies and television programs, Hello Kitty's success has brought about two amusement parks called Harmonyland and Sanrio Puroland.


Cabbage Patch Kids, originally called Little People Originals, was crafted in 1976 by an art student named, Xavier Roberts. Xavier handmade the dolls and sold them at craft shows charging a $40 adoption fee. From there, the dolls became a worldwide phenomenon. In 1983, Cabbage Patch dolls had set the record as the most successful doll in the history of toys. Xavier has not only brought the joy of adopting these dolls but has also contributed to various charities with the proceeds. Celebrity dolls were made and sold on eBay to raise money for different charities. Like Hello Kitty, Cabbage Patch Kids are featured in movies, caroons, backpacks and toys.




In 1947 the Lego Company, who previously made wooden toys, started producing plastic interlocking bricks that were inspired by a toy called Automatic Binding Bricks. At first, creator Ole Christiansen's attempt to market these toys failed. Several years later, after changing the design and material, the modern Lego blocks were patented and began to catch on as a creative toy. Today, Lego has liscensed not only toys, but also video games, movies, theme sets including Star Wars, Halo, Harry Potter. Today, you can see Legos on clothing, school supplies and board games. The infamous Legoland is a dream come true for all kids.